ABSTRACT
There are very few studies about the quality of care (QoC) in Chinese county hospitals. Using 7, 6, and 6 standard operations from clinical pathways as the process indicators, we evaluated the quality of stroke, pneumonia, and heart failure care, respectively. We also conducted chi-squared tests to detect differences of quality between selected counties or hospitals. We extracted relevant information from medical records of 421 stroke cases, 329 pneumonia cases, and 341 heart failure cases, which were sampled from 6 county hospitals in 3 counties of eastern China. The average proportion of recommended care delivered included stroke, pneumonia, and heart failure patients at 55.36%, 41.64%, and 49.56%, respectively. Great variation of QoC was detected not only across selected counties but between comprehensive county hospitals and traditional Chinese medicine county hospitals. We deny the widely-accepted assumptions that poor QoC should be blamed on defectively-equipped facilities or medicine and overwhelmed care providers. Instead, we speculate the low qualifications of medical workers, failed clinical knowledge translation, incorrect diagnosis, and a lack of electronic systems could be the reasons behind poor QoC. It is high time for China to put QoC as the national health priority.